I was surprised that he said there were no downloads! Who does not like Kung-fu monks?!!?Solomoriah wrote:Darn you, Mr. Smoot. Darn you mightily for finding my error!SmootRK wrote:I am willing to bet that there is a coding error with that entry on the download page. The counter is just not working.artikid wrote:Personally, I'm willing to see the Great Way Adept go.
While I attempted to emulate the Monk from 'the advanced era' or the Mystic from a certain Cyclopedia, I can also see it sparked zero interest (zero downloads).
![]()
Fixed now. 799 downloads. Artikid, it's not as bad as it seemed.
The Problem of Class Proliferation
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
*raises hand*SmootRK wrote:I was surprised that he said there were no downloads! Who does not like Kung-fu monks?!!?
Though, to be honest, it has more to do with linguistics than the archetype, I absolutely adore the old TV show Kung-Fu. My character enters a monastery and asks "what wine did they make?" not "what style of kung-fu did they practice?"
Characters:
Himamura Jin (Night Wizard; Level 6 Great One/Level 1 Caster)
Benjamin d'Aide (BFRPG; level 5 cleric of the virtue of Sacrifice) - recurring hireling turned pseudo-DMPC
Himamura Jin (Night Wizard; Level 6 Great One/Level 1 Caster)
Benjamin d'Aide (BFRPG; level 5 cleric of the virtue of Sacrifice) - recurring hireling turned pseudo-DMPC
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
Of course I don't mean that MONK needs placement in every single campaign (I don't have such a class in my games)... but who does not like the idea of David Carradine (in his prime) or Jet Li jumping around kicking butt?Steveman wrote:*raises hand*SmootRK wrote:I was surprised that he said there were no downloads! Who does not like Kung-fu monks?!!?
Though, to be honest, it has more to do with linguistics than the archetype, I absolutely adore the old TV show Kung-Fu. My character enters a monastery and asks "what wine did they make?" not "what style of kung-fu did they practice?"
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
I think there needs to be an official class supplement book. I don't like having more than one or two versions of classes to sift through. Thats just me.
Droyson Fillif Level 3 cleric
- shadowmane
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:25 pm
- Location: Salisbury, North Carolina
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
I like Great Way Adept.
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
I know what you mean... but the wording needs to be clear, that NO SUPPLEMENTS are necessary or truly "official" for play. The problem with making an Official Supplement (and something that we will likely be dealing with) is that once one is made, people will think that everyone 'should use' the materials. Which is not the case.xav++ wrote:I think there needs to be an official class supplement book. I don't like having more than one or two versions of classes to sift through. Thats just me.
This occurred in 1e with the Unearthed Arcanana (and a lesser extent to some materials written by EGG in the Dragon - back then anything penned by EGG was considered 'official'). Cavaliers, Deep Gnomes, Drow, etc. all became official even when they were rather unbalanced.
To avoid this issue, the wording in the introductory section must be absolutely clear that NO SUPPLEMENT IS OFFICIAL in the sense of being necessary for play. All material outside the core books is optional and each GM has absolute control over what appears in the game.
Personally I wouldn't care if hundreds of new options were shared... I will use what I want and plainly ignore what does not suit me... but I agree that some semi-official set would be an excellent addition to our game overall. It would help even in modules and such, where the author can (more) easily add such items as Rangers or Paladins or whatever.
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
I don't think that DMs need to have that warning. If they have a backbone they tell their players "no we aren't using the supplement" Or "We can use A but not B from the supplement."
Droyson Fillif Level 3 cleric
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
eeeh, they do. As much as we want to assume common sense, we can not assume common sense.
Characters:
Himamura Jin (Night Wizard; Level 6 Great One/Level 1 Caster)
Benjamin d'Aide (BFRPG; level 5 cleric of the virtue of Sacrifice) - recurring hireling turned pseudo-DMPC
Himamura Jin (Night Wizard; Level 6 Great One/Level 1 Caster)
Benjamin d'Aide (BFRPG; level 5 cleric of the virtue of Sacrifice) - recurring hireling turned pseudo-DMPC
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
I agree. Seen it before, so no reason to expect it would happen otherwise in the future. I think the only way to stop that is to explicitly spell it out so there is no doubt. The GM decides what appears in the game, either in whole or in part.Steveman wrote:eeeh, they do. As much as we want to assume common sense, we can not assume common sense.
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
Find Me:
https://mewe.com/i/robertsmoot
See my shirt designs:
https://www.teepublic.com/user/smoot-life
- Dimirag
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:24 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires (C.A.B.A.), Argentina
- Contact:
Re: The Problem of Class Proliferation
We must consider that newer GM's have 0 experience regarding game balance and almost 0 capability for discerning between something OFFICIAL and something that seems official but it isn't.
Besides, if we start labeling supplements as officials we run the risk of "closing the door" to people who want to support the game with their own creation "why would a upload my X sub-class, which is rather interesting/good, if theres already an official one", we must try to avoid this...
Besides, if we start labeling supplements as officials we run the risk of "closing the door" to people who want to support the game with their own creation "why would a upload my X sub-class, which is rather interesting/good, if theres already an official one", we must try to avoid this...
Sorry for any misspelling or writing error, I am not a native English speaker
Drawing portfolio: https://www.instagram.com/m.serena_dimirag/
Drawing portfolio: https://www.instagram.com/m.serena_dimirag/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests
