A Comment on the "Companion"/Advanced Question

[Daucuscarota]

Sure. I will write something soon-ish and pass it by you.

I really liked the way you explained it. I want to read your article about the magic-user.

On the topic of a companion, I don't think we need one. Basic Fantasy Role-Playing Game is a whole game, and we don't need anything else to play the game. Adventures and bestiaries are great, but not essential.

Personally, what I would like (but not ask, much less demand to), is a supplement for the GM, explaining things like monster creation. Why a certain creature has 3 hit dice and some other, 8 hit dice? Is there an "objective" reason? It was decided just because? I assign stats as I find them appropriate for a certain monster, but I don't follow a thoughtful method, other than what James Raggi of Lamentations of the Flame Princess suggest: the monster has to be the focus or an integral part of the adventure, not just a thing to fill yet another room. But that's aesthetic, perhaps even pshilosophical, not mechanic, and some mechanics to make monsters would be much appreciated.

[orobouros]

For monsters you can get some inspiration from their appearance and environment as to how powerful they are.

A red dragon has to defend its lair against all kinds of threats, is huge, has devastating attacks, and very tough scales. Of course it's going to be very hard to fight and high hit dice.

Orcs and goblins are pretty much nasty humans with about as much strength and abilities. Pretty simply to deal with or even kill, so they're low hit dice.

A monster that has to confront danger often to feed or mate is going to be a lot more dangerous than one that manages to survive by quickly escaping or avoiding detection all together.

There's quite a bit of thought these days that goes into dungeon ecology. No longer are they just connected rooms with monsters waiting to fight you, but environments where different parties may come across each other. What makes sense where you'd normally encounter a new enemy?

As a final thought, hit dice is far from the be-all-end-all of difficulty. A bunch of kobolds or goblins in a well constructed trap can be very very deadly.

[WandererExiled]

I'm not sure what companion everyone is talking about (haven't spent time enough to know). But the one singular thing about BF that draws me in is its simplicity yet customizability. I love the fact that IF I wanted to I can add or take away as much as I wanted and still have a balanced game. That's something that I don't feel that Pathfinders or DnD allows (at least not without selling blood).

However, with that comes the question of is this compatible (deemed by Basic Fantasy) with the core and supplements? And how can we help players and GMs organize all these adds for ease of access in campaigns? Some people like it Basic were as others like it physics class complex.

If an official download is off the table (as I believe it should be), why not a catalog that categorizes the balanced and unbalanced with small one sentence descriptions and links to the most recent iteration? That way people can still customize and GMs can create their own companions as long as it's explicitly noted as Unofficial.

This is just a thought.

[Solomoriah]

If a supplement is on the Downloads page, I believe it's okay (balanced, etc.) and will not wreck a game. This is the primary criterion for inclusion there... I won't even consider a supplement if I'm not confident it doesn't seriously break the game.

[Longman]

And how can we help players and GMs organize all these adds for ease of access in campaigns?

I'd frame the question as "how do we encourage new players and GMs to think about what kind of supplements they want to use, before they go looking?"

It's tricky because there is no accounting for taste and no teaching experience. An experienced GM might well realise that if buffs are given to one class in the game, other classes should get some too. Otherwise you get a Magic User class with Free Casting and Free Cantrip use, and the Cleric class gets nothing extra. That sort of thing. You have to already know at least something about how new powers will affect the game.

Supplements should also be selected based on your game millieu. In an outdoors game you'd want a ranger class. In a city intrigue game you might want an assasin class. And so on. The choice should be based on the game, it shouldn't determine the game.

I think time spent playing by the core rules and then thinking "what do I want extra?" is the main solution to many of these questions by new players. Otherwise you just get splat-books and power creep, and that doesn't really add to the game or story, it just make the PCs tougher at lower levels, so the DM has to adjust by making the monsters tougher, etc. It's a treadmill, and getting off the treadmill seems like the whole reason the OSR happened in the first place.

TLDR? The site is actually quite well organised already, you just have to know what you want. That's my ten cents.

[Hywaywolf]

I think time spent playing by the core rules and then thinking "what do I want extra?" is the main solution to many of these questions by new players. Otherwise you just get splat-books and power creep, and that doesn't really add to the game or story, it just make the PCs tougher at lower levels, so the DM has to adjust by making the monsters tougher, etc. It's a treadmill, and getting off the treadmill seems like the whole reason the OSR happened in the first place.

This is the key right here. If you don't already know what you want then just play the core rules and add things as you need them (if you need them). And even if you are experienced with modern gaming but not "old school" or retro gaming, then why not start with the core rules and figure out what it is you can do without that you never thought you could.