Search found 326 matches

by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:27 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Necromancer Supplement
Replies: 102
Views: 24757

Re: Necromancer Supplement

Enveneration? Maybe we could find a better name for this one?
Why not just Energy Drain?
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:42 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Illusionists Supplement
Replies: 48
Views: 8280

Re: Illusionists Supplement

It sounds like it would be perfect.
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:39 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Druids Supplement
Replies: 132
Views: 30218

Re: Druids Supplement

Yours come with the cursed version, Ring of Natural Ailment.
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:13 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Druids Supplement
Replies: 132
Views: 30218

Re: Druids Supplement

Ring of the Green?
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:00 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Illusionists Supplement
Replies: 48
Views: 8280

Re: Illusionists Supplement

Could use a mage style necromancer staff or two.
Maybe like a Staff of the Dead with a skull on top and several necromancer spells (like a staff of power basically) and a retributive strike that drains level.
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 10:12 am
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Druids Supplement
Replies: 132
Views: 30218

Re: Druids Supplement

It's more a "treepasser" actually. I think it's informed by the campaign one runs. You're druid might be closer to a witch because you don't have many religions. My druid might worship Gaea which is definitively earth centric. Yes, the original had fire. Maybe not Flame Strike though. That one has a...
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:49 am
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Illusionists Supplement
Replies: 48
Views: 8280

Re: Illusionists Supplement

The only reason is that it's harder to come up with illusions that any MU spell.

So, 12-12-12-10-10-10 then?
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:44 am
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Necromancer Supplement
Replies: 102
Views: 24757

Re: Necromancer Supplement

I have to ask, though, why specifically Chill? I have changed the request from Chill to Stoneskin. The reason for Stoneskin is because it really isn't "Stoneskin", as it Stoneskin should be much more impressive. So, what I'd like to do is: 1) Add a more proper version of Stoneskin to New Spells or ...
by Seven
Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:38 am
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Necromancer Supplement
Replies: 102
Views: 24757

Re: Necromancer Supplement

And I don't like having different versions of a spell with the same name. I never liked that in 1E with Continual Light, and we don't have it different here. I'm fine with making Word of Recall the same as the standard Cleric version in this case; the rationale seems sound. What was the difference?...
by Seven
Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:32 pm
Forum: The Workshop
Topic: Basic Fantasy RPG Core Rules 3rd Edition
Replies: 879
Views: 241695

Re: Basic Fantasy RPG Core Rules 3rd Edition

One more thing.

It seems the alphabetical order is weird.
Speak with Dead is after Speak with Monster and Speak with Plants in the Spells section.