Tainted and Touched
Tainted and Touched
OK, so recent posts got me moving creatively. Here is my take on the Tiefling/Aasimar sort of thing. I like the direction it took, becoming akin to Quasi-Classes... basically a Quasi-Race sort of idea.
Please give it a look and critique. If the collective here feels it is worthy, then I will put this into the showcase, but it can probably use a little polishing first.
EDIT: Files updated with suggestions and corrections.
File also added to Showcase.
Please give it a look and critique. If the collective here feels it is worthy, then I will put this into the showcase, but it can probably use a little polishing first.
EDIT: Files updated with suggestions and corrections.
File also added to Showcase.
- Attachments
-
- Tainted and Touched.pdf
- (84.8 KiB) Downloaded 646 times
-
- Tainted and Touched.odt
- (35.9 KiB) Downloaded 526 times
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Re: Tainted & Touched
Nice!
One criticism is that I think the Half-Tainteds spell bonus might be more useful and be able to increase more spells then the the Half-Touched ability.
Is a Dark Elf or Half-Dragon in the works too? Hope so!
One criticism is that I think the Half-Tainteds spell bonus might be more useful and be able to increase more spells then the the Half-Touched ability.
Is a Dark Elf or Half-Dragon in the works too? Hope so!
To defend: This is the Pact.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
Re: Tainted & Touched
I am inclined to give the Touched bonus of +2/die of healing spells, in addition to what I have mentioned already.
Perhaps I can work on others soon as well. Some of my entries in the New Monster Thread were designed as potentials for new races... especially in my campaign that has a Paleo Semi-IceAge North American sort of vibe. I really got to get some of my campaign ideas down in print... basically in my head and I don't even know if the players notice the difference really.
Perhaps I can work on others soon as well. Some of my entries in the New Monster Thread were designed as potentials for new races... especially in my campaign that has a Paleo Semi-IceAge North American sort of vibe. I really got to get some of my campaign ideas down in print... basically in my head and I don't even know if the players notice the difference really.
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 3:54 pm
Re: Tainted & Touched
Great work Smoot. Here are a handful of suggestions:
We also need to fix the headers, they still say "Old Monsters as New Races".
The bonus Darkvision is a cool touch. I would change to say that creatures without Darkvision get the bonus 30' and creatures with Darkvision get bonus 15'.
Here are the files with those suggestions:
I think back story here should be one word.Regardless of back story, the character with such
becomes something more.
We also need to fix the headers, they still say "Old Monsters as New Races".
The bonus Darkvision is a cool touch. I would change to say that creatures without Darkvision get the bonus 30' and creatures with Darkvision get bonus 15'.
Here are the files with those suggestions:
- Attachments
-
- Tainted and Touched.odt
- (35.83 KiB) Downloaded 449 times
-
- Tainted and Touched.pdf
- (85.73 KiB) Downloaded 461 times
Re: Tainted & Touched
All suggestions taken into account (although I like round numbers so I chose +10' Darkvision extension instead). Also added in the +2/die bonus to healing effects (in addition to the casting at +2 levels higher). I took time to modify the text so that every reference is not capitalized. (I write so poorly on first drafts). Spidyfan21 and Blood axe, please PM me how you would like to be credited, as I feel that both of you contributed to this (noting the other threads' communications as well). I would not have even gotten started on this if it didn't initially start elsewhere with the ideas provided.spidyfan21 wrote:Great work Smoot. Here are a handful of suggestions:
I think back story here should be one word.Regardless of back story, the character with such
becomes something more.
We also need to fix the headers, they still say "Old Monsters as New Races".
The bonus Darkvision is a cool touch. I would change to say that creatures without Darkvision get the bonus 30' and creatures with Darkvision get bonus 15'.
Here are the files with those suggestions:
I will update the files in the first post shortly after I finish going through the document again.
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Re: Tainted & Touched
No credit for me, you did all the hard work. Hope to see more like this. I love the Orc, Goblins, and other humanoid races. Great stuff. I'm thinking of a humanoid campaign.
To defend: This is the Pact.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
Re: Tainted & Touched
A few suggestions
Innate ability to detect evil / good?
Vulnerable to protection from evil / good, etc.
Bless and curse spells and have the opposite effect, etc.
Seems like a nice simple take on this idea. I was thought the 'tiefling' was badly overcooked in Pathfinder, so good to see it getting a basic treatment.
Innate ability to detect evil / good?
Vulnerable to protection from evil / good, etc.
Bless and curse spells and have the opposite effect, etc.
Seems like a nice simple take on this idea. I was thought the 'tiefling' was badly overcooked in Pathfinder, so good to see it getting a basic treatment.
Re: Tainted & Touched
BFRPG being sans actual alignment, made me want to gloss over such topics, however I can see where Protection from Evil/Good might be appropriate. If I remember correctly in other game/editions, the spell specifically mentions outsiders... however, BFRPG's spell does not necessarily mention outsiders in the same way. I am going to consider this, but not rush into the change.Longman wrote:A few suggestions
Innate ability to detect evil / good?
Vulnerable to protection from evil / good, etc.
Bless and curse spells and have the opposite effect, etc.
Seems like a nice simple take on this idea. I was thought the 'tiefling' was badly overcooked in Pathfinder, so good to see it getting a basic treatment.
FYI - because I feel like I am onto something almost formulaic in how I did this, I might do the elemental or gensai sorts in similar fashion. For when those genies (ie marids, dao, djinni, or efreeti folk) or other elemental humanoids get freaky-deaky with the mortals. It is a finer line though, as I do not believe Gensai show up as open content.
Is it really the end, not some crazy dream?
Re: Tainted & Touched
I kind of like the idea of them being affected by Protection from Evil/Good. it shows their "not of this world", at least partially. Maybe just a limited effect of a +1 bonus to those being protected.
To defend: This is the Pact.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
But when life loses its value,
and is taken for naught -
then the Pact is to Avenge.
Re: Tainted & Touched
I'd be interested to see the genie / dao /efreet supplement. I'm running a game in which such creatures are found, and I am interested in the notion that they might have semi-human offspring. Hadn't occurred to me before.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests